Mahua Moitra faces expulsion from Lok Sabha
Trinamool Congress leader Mahua Moitra has been a prominent figure in recent news due to the ‘Cash-for-Query’ Case. Moitra faced expulsion from the Lok Sabha as a Member of Parliament, and sources now reveal that she has received a notice to vacate her official residence within the next 30 days.
Additionally, Mahua Moitra has taken her case to the Supreme Court, challenging her removal from the Lok Sabha as an MP. This move follows her alleged acceptance of gifts and cash from a businessman to pose questions in Parliament, targeting the Narendra Modi-led BJP government.
Recent reports indicate that Mahua Moitra has been formally instructed to leave her official residence in New Delhi within 30 days. This directive comes subsequent to her expulsion from the Lok Sabha over the ‘Cash-For-Query’ Case, citing ‘unethical conduct’ as a parliamentarian.
Mahua Moitra swiftly approached the Supreme Court after her removal from the Lok Sabha in connection with the ‘cash-for-query’ controversy. Following her expulsion, Moitra criticized the Ethics Panel for acting without substantiated evidence and condemned its use as a tool to overpower the opposition.
A report suggested that an investigation into the ‘money trail’ between Mahua Moitra and businessman Darshan Hiranandani should be conducted by the Government of India in a legally bound and timely manner, considering it as part of a ‘quid pro quo’ arrangement.
The report concluded that Moitra had ‘deliberately’ shared her Lok Sabha login credentials with Hiranandani, hence finding her guilty of unethical conduct, breaching parliamentary privileges, and showing contempt towards the House.
Expressing dissatisfaction after being ousted from her MP position due to “unethical conduct,” Moitra criticized the government’s actions, asserting that the Ethics Committee lacked the authority to expel members and claimed it marked the beginning of the BJP’s decline. Mahua Moitra vehemently opposed the decision, likening it to a verdict by a biased “kangaroo court,” and accused the government of manipulating parliamentary committees to intimidate opposition voices into compliance.
Moitra stated, “There is no evidence of cash or gifts involved. The expulsion is solely based on my sharing of the Lok Sabha portal login. There are no defined regulations governing the sharing of login credentials. As revealed during the Ethics Committee hearing, MPs act as conduits to relay public queries and voices in Parliament.”
Moitra further emphasized that the expulsion decision was solely rooted in her act of sharing the Lok Sabha portal login, stressing the absence of clear guidelines governing such actions. She underscored during the Ethics Committee hearing that Members of Parliament serve as channels to articulate public concerns and viewpoints within Parliament.
In her defense, Moitra adamantly maintained that there was no concrete evidence of any monetary transactions or acceptance of gifts. Her expulsion hinged entirely upon the sharing of login credentials, an action she argued lacked definitive regulations or rules.
The episode raised Moitra’s voice against what she viewed as a calculated effort by the ruling party to stifle dissent within the parliamentary framework. She accused the government of wielding parliamentary committees as instruments to silence opposition voices, denouncing this tactic as a means of coercing compliance rather than upholding democratic values.
Amid the ongoing legal tussle, Mahua Moitra’s stand remains firm in contesting her expulsion from the Lok Sabha. Her stance aligns with challenging the decision as a misuse of power and an infringement on her rights as a Member of Parliament. The case continues to draw attention as it poses critical questions about the bounds of parliamentary privilege, ethical conduct, and the wielding of authority within India’s political landscape.
The aftermath of Moitra’s expulsion from the Lok Sabha has not only sparked legal battles but has also triggered broader debates within the political arena. Supporters of Moitra have rallied behind her, framing her expulsion as a disproportionate response to what they perceive as a procedural oversight rather than an ethical transgression.
On the other hand, critics of Mahua Moitra have reiterated the gravity of the alleged breach, emphasizing the ethical standards expected from elected representatives. They argue that regardless of the absence of tangible evidence regarding monetary exchanges, the act of sharing official credentials represents a breach of parliamentary protocol.
Mohan Yadav Takes Helm as Madhya Pradesh’s CM After BJP’s Seal of Approval
